Red Flags to Watch For When You Hire Developers Abroad > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day should be treated as a warning, not a service level. An experienced provider will come back with questions first: about who owns the data and what happens on failure. A vendor custom .net development that prices without asking anything is probably pricing a guess, and a guess becomes a change request later — on your budget.

Watch for a mismatch between the team in the pitch and those who eventually appear in the repository. Request named engineers in the contract, with wording that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A provider that only offers roles and never names specific engineers is keeping its own flexibility at your cost.

Insist on access to the repository from the first week. A choosing software development partner that delivers a build only at the end of each phase is asking you to take delivery on faith. Daily commits tell you who is really on the project far better than a slide deck. The same holds for the automated test suite: if it does not exist, quality claims are unverifiable.

Loose wording in the contract around code ownership is rarely an oversight. The contract must state plainly that all deliverables become the property of the client on payment. Check also which country's law applies and the milestone terms: heavy prepayment with no milestone tied to it eliminates your only leverage.

Last, pay attention to the working rhythm. Confirm what overlap the teams will share with your working day, who answers your questions and within what is livewire time. A few hours of overlap is usually enough; none at all converts every clarification into a day of delay. Careless writing in the early emails rarely improves once the work starts.